archive-org.com » ORG » C » CEDADEBATE.ORG

Total: 459

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • 2009 CEDA Scholastic All Americans Announced | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Nick Whitman College Hamilton Brent Gonzaga University Harold Paul University of Southern California Inamullah Ovais Emory University John Powers Talon Macalester College Johnson Nate University of Kansas Jones Michael University of Southern California Kennedy Patrick University of Kansas Lazarevic Mima University of Southern California Lowry Sean James Madison University Malsin Mikaela Emory University Mendenhall Beth Kansas State University Miller Nicholas Emory University Montreuil Paul Idaho State University Movens Scott Emory University Nathan Cohn Nathan Whitman College Nikolic Ana Emory University Norris Cameron Vanderbilt University Pramanik Pradeep Emory University Rinker Patrick Wichita State University Scott Stephanie University of Southern California Silver Lewis Whitman College Straus Daniel Whitman College Thomas Jeffrey Emory University Webb Clay Missouri State University Weil Stephen Emory University Woods Heather Kansas State University Second team Scholastic All Americans Students must have 1 at least a 3 25 cumulative GPA 2 have attained at least sophomore standing and 3 competed in at least 18 rounds in the open division Abrams Brian Vanderbilt University Berger Alex Illinois State University Campbell Lincoln University of Minnesota Chaganti Shruti James Madison University Cooper Deven Towson University Federwisch Victoria James Madison University Foley Jordan Missouri State University Freudenheim Mark Emory University Holt Hunter Vanderbilt University Husney Rebecca Missouri State University Hyche Darrell Missouri State University Jennings Danielle Idaho State University Katzman Marilyn University of Southern California Kosic Robert Illinois State University Kruse Aaron Missouri State University Laskey Matt Emory University Madani Ali Emory University McGuire Molly Kansas State University Moliver Jordan University of Florida Patel Amit West Virginia University Powers Meghan West Virginia University Robinson Eric Wichita State University Rowland Judith Missouri State University Senghas Matt Emory University Stark Michael West Virginia University Stout Kristen Missouri State University Torsiello Matthew Binghamton University Waller Richard Vanderbilt University Whipkey Marleah West Virginia University Zimmerman Jeremy West

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/826 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive


  • New Awards Page Online | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Awards Page Online Mon 2009 03 09 11 59 ceda CEDA has just launched its newest site awards cedadebate org The new page will house historical documents such as CEDA Nationals tournament results an archive of all CEDA awards nominations for future awards and other awards information Check the site during CEDA Nationals for announcements of 2009 winners Most information on previous award winners is up to date Most 2008

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/821 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • NDT First Round at Large Bid Announcement | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Large Bid Announcement Mon 2009 02 16 15 35 stables This information was provided by the Director of the NDT John Fritch Congratulations to all of these teams California BP Dartmouth AH Emory MS Emory WS Harvard RS Kansas BJ

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/803 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Rowland Call for contributions | Cross Examination Debate Association
    KU and am currently a member of the Board of Trustees of the NDT Our working group has the assignment of looking at the professional status of debate coaches and exploring whether a successor document to the Quail Roost Statement on the web site of the AFA might be created that could be used by debate coaches in various types of positions to explain to the administration of their particular school the appropriate professional standards for evaluating their work One problem that coaches face again and again is that university administrations don t understand the demands of competitive debate and traditional standards for tenure and promotion are often inappropriate This has caused many universities including my own to move to some kind of appointment for the debate coach other than that of a tenure track faculty member As a first step in carrying out our assignment we want to gather information about the nature of your appointment and the standards by which it is evaluated Of course this information will be kept confidential and we will report only data within categories Jarrod Atchison has graciously agreed to analyze this data We hope you will take a moment and email him information about your appointment and the way it is evaluated His email is jarrod atchison gmail com Please copy me on that message as well My email is rrowland ku edu We also would value any insights that you might have on the document that the working group eventually will draft It is our hope that we can describe appropriate evaluative standards for a number of different types of appointments for debate coaches As someone who has both been an active coach and a department chair for a decade I know that the demands on coaches are enormous and very

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/802 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Professional Development Committee | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Association Main menu Login Home Forum Journal Newsletters You are here Home Professional Development Committee Rowland Call for contributions Sun 2009 02 15 14 24 louden Colleagues CATEGORY Professional Development

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/taxonomy/term/57 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • CEDA Awards - The Outstanding New Competitor Award | Cross Examination Debate Association
    CEDA championship tournament Their application should show evidence of growth and participation in the activity The student s participation during the year may have been at any level of competition e g varsity junior varsity or novice No preference will be given for either regional or national travel schedules Name of submitter Submitter s email Name of nominee Nomination letter Files must be less than 800 KB Allowed file types

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/724?page=10 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • CEDA Awards - The All-American Debate Squad Award | Cross Examination Debate Association
    intercollegiate debate They should demonstrate competitive success academic success good conduct and contributions to their squad No more than two students from a given school shall receive this award At least two recipients must be from community college programs Name of submitter Submitter s email Name of nominee Nomination Letter Files must be less than 800 KB Allowed file types gif jpg png txt rtf html odf pdf doc docx

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/723?page=10 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • CAD: 1980 | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Home CAD 1980 Thu 2008 06 26 22 28 ceda 1980 Volume 1 Front matter Henderson Theoretical implications of debating non policy propositions Zarefsky Criteria for evaluating non policy argument Trapp A situationally guided perspective for propositions of judgement Vasilius

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/year_1980 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive



  •