archive-org.com » ORG » C » CEDADEBATE.ORG

Total: 459

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • Proposed resolutions for 2009 - 2010 | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Resolution 2 Resolved The United States Federal Government should substantially reduce the size of its nuclear weapons arsenal and or substantially reduce and restrict the role and or missions of its nuclear weapons arsenal Resolution 3 Resolved The United States Federal Government should substantially change its nuclear posture in one or more of the following ways Ratification and implementation of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Adoption of a nuclear

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/?q=node/893 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive


  • MISCELLANEOUS | Cross Examination Debate Association
    to main content Cross Examination Debate Association Main menu Login Home Forum Journal Newsletters You are here Home MISCELLANEOUS For all other topics There is currently no content classified with

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/taxonomy/term/33 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • PENN, HARVARD DEBATERS ACCUSED OF EMBEZZLING IN COURT PAPERS FILED IN PHILADELPHIA | Cross Examination Debate Association
    papers filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia LD Debaters Alex McCobin of Penn and Lily Deng of Harvard have been accused of embezzling more than 37 000 00 from the Penn Parlimentary LD debate teams their own non profit foundation set up to allegedly run an urban debate league in Philadelphia and from various other organizations and persons as well according to both the filed court papers

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/901 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Awards page ickness.. | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Anonymous not verified On the awards page the feeds only let me see the first 5 awards i wish it was set to show me the most recent 5 The most recent 5 are more than likely what i am

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/844 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • after you view posts (replies) in the topic area--you cannot view them any longer | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Login Home Forum Journal Newsletters You are here Home after you view posts replies in the topic area you cannot view them any longer Wed 2009 04 29 22 32

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/842 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Curriculum Discussion -- 6 v. 8; and strikesheet | Cross Examination Debate Association
    a For tourneys large enough to clear beyond octas is 6 rounds a good idea or should we stick with 8 rounds b Should the community retain preference sheets but consider moving back to less powerful preference sheets for instance A B C strike I am genuinely interested in listening not really pushing one idea over another at this time We welcome feedback from coaches judges alums and of course

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/node/231 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • CAD: 1989 | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Thu 2008 06 26 22 19 ceda 1989 Volume 10 Front matter Brownlee Croassman Advocacy values and cost benefit analysis Dudczak Topicality an equal ground standard Hill Toward a holistic model of presumption for non policy debate Baker Loge Context exploration paradigmatic variance beyond current uses of criteria Berube Hasty generalization revisited part one on being representative examples Leeman Hamlett Calling a counter warrant a counter warrant an immodest proposal

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/year_1989 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive

  • CAD: 1990 | Cross Examination Debate Association
    Resolutional relevance a primary standard for evaluating criteria in non policy debat e Berube Parameters for criteria debating Meldrum Development of the method of evaluation in CEDA debate Preston The potential for generic argumentation in cross examination debate association debate toward the development of standards Mallin The application of proximate cause to CEDA debate O Dor A process perspective of definitional arguments FORUM Steinfatt College debate a quarter century later

    Original URL path: http://cedadebate.org/year_1990 (2016-02-13)
    Open archived version from archive



  •