archive-org.com » ORG » C » CTMUCOMMUNITY.ORG

Total: 149

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language - CTMU Wiki
    SCSPL Normally languages are considered to be in the minds of people and they work on the basis of moving symbols around mentally where said symbols represent things in the outside world By attempting to represent things in the outside world with language one gets closer and closer in accuracy of description to the things one attempts to describe the more expressive powerful the language is What would happen if a language was so expressive that it contained every piece of information on the thing it wishes to describe to the highest resolution possible You would have the SCSPL coding of that object in the universe which is identical to the object itself Thought about in another way if one asks themselves what does the SCSPL coding of a tennis ball look like the answer is the tennis ball itself Other languages that SCSPL provides a syntactic covering for see description of syntactic covering and Human Cognitive Syntax include the laws of physics the laws of mathematics the expressions of the human mind or HCS Retrieved from http ctmucommunity org w index php title Self Configuring Self Processing Language oldid 349 Navigation menu Personal tools Create account Log in Namespaces

    Original URL path: http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-Configuring_Self-Processing_Language (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive


  • Telesis - CTMU Wiki
    the universe consists of one dual aspect substance infocognition created by internal feedback within an even more basic one aspect substance called telesis 1 Thus whereas UBT consists of infocognitive potential a specific reality SCSPL consists of infocognition Once bound in a primitive infocognitive form that drives emergence the MU form telesis continues to be refined into new infocognitive configurations as reality evolves Notes Langan Christopher M Physics and Metaphysics

    Original URL path: http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telesis (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Infocognition - CTMU Wiki
    and thus to cognitive information Information is the objective aspect of the quantum transducer for itself and for all others it is cognition for cognition equating generalistically to a cognitive identity relation on that part of reality to which it corresponds i e the part containing all the transducers playing active and passive roles in it Langan 1992 Noesis 76 Because cognition and generic information transduction are identical up to isomorphism after all cognition is just the specific form of information processing that occurs in a mind information processing can be described as generalized cognition and the coincidence of information and processor can be referred to as infocognition Reality thus consists of a single substance infocognition with two aspects corresponding to transduction and being transduced Describing reality as infocognition thus amounts to infocognitive dual aspect monism Where infocognition equals the distributed generalized self perception and self cognition of reality infocognitive monism implies a stratified form of panpsychism in which at least three levels of self cognition can be distinguished with respect to scope power and coherence global agentive and subordinate Retooling the information concept consists of three steps First it must be equipped with the means of its own transduction or transformative processing Where information transduction is cognitively recognized as generalized cognition this amounts to replacing it with a dual aspect quantum of reflexivity infocognition which embodies telic feedback Second its bit structure a simplistic and rather uninspired blend of 2 valued propositional logic and probability theory must be extended to accommodate logic as a whole including 1 predicate logic 2 model theory and 3 language theory broadly including the theories of mathematical languages metalanguages and generative grammars After all since information does nothing but attribute linguistically organized predicates to objects in the context of models its meaning involves the mathematics of predicates languages and models And third it must be generalized to an ultimate ancestral medium telesis from which cognitive syntax and its informational content arise by specificative feedback as part of a unified complex a recursive coupling of information and metainformation or transductive syntax The answer is hiding in the question Laws do not stand on their own but must be defined with respect to the objects and attributes on which they act and which they accept as parameters Similarly objects and attributes do not stand on their own but must be defined with respect to the rules of structure organization and transformation that govern them It follows that the active medium of cross definition possesses logical primacy over laws and arguments alike and is thus pre informational and pre nomological in nature i e telic Telesis which can be characterized as infocognitive potential is the primordial active medium from which laws and their arguments and parameters emerge by mutual refinement or telic recursion Langan 2002 PCID pg 33 35 6 Even if CTMU were a definition rather than a theory definitions are necessary components of theories There is an inclusory relation not a total distinction between the

    Original URL path: http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Infocognition (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • UBT - CTMU Wiki
    the process of telic recursion Since reality has a self defined informational boundary distinguishing it from its complement unactualized potential or unreality it has recognizable content and structure On the other hand UBT is a realm of zero constraint and infinite possibility where neither boundary nor content exists 1 Notes Langan 2002 p 48 Retrieved from http ctmucommunity org w index php title UBT oldid 25 Navigation menu Personal tools

    Original URL path: http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Unbound_telesis (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Three Cs / Three Ms - CTMU Wiki
    a theory which has the truth property in the same sense as does logic but permits the evaluation of statements about reality Langan calls such a theory a supertautology The Three Cs and Three Ms can be viewed as axioms of the CTMU with the caveat that they are not meant to be independent assumptions but rather to be true a priori and analytically implied by each other Retrieved from

    Original URL path: http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Three_Ms (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • MAP - CTMU Wiki
    B which can be defined in terms of C which can be defined in terms of A In this way reality s definition of aspects of itself is Closed The following link graphically demonstrates the principle of Closure http megafoundation org CTMU images MAP jpg Although to many people this principle might seem utterly trivial Langan argues that in fact it is not as scientists tend to violate it often inadvertently or otherwise For example M theorists and Superstring theorists often propose a higher dimensional space i e an 11 dimensional spacetime However the postulation of this higher dimensional space cannot really be external to reality for if it were there would be no means to identify it or theorize about it Hence if 11 dimensional 26 dimensional n dimensional etc spacetime exists it must be internal to reality Another example is the recent advent in science of the popularization of Everett s Many Worlds interpretation of quantum theory Langan objects to the Many Worlds interpretation arguing that if there were these infinitely many parallel quantum realities they would have to be connected to some one fundamental reality or else there would be no connection between their existential laws and

    Original URL path: http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/MAP (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • M=R - CTMU Wiki
    we can know the world through the senses and in that sense it may be the most common sense and simplistic of the CTMU principles The M R principle does not state that you can simply think something into existence or that the world doesn t exist when you re not looking at it or anything ridiculous like that It simply states that the universe possesses general laws that conform

    Original URL path: http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/M%3DR (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • MU - CTMU Wiki
    off and occupy two different realities as is proposed in multiverse theory More specifically MU states that inasmuch as objects processes and events differ with respect to each other they are fundamentally the same in the very general sense of sharing the same existential medium reality The MU could be stated quite simply in the phrase different but the same Retrieved from http ctmucommunity org w index php title MU

    Original URL path: http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/MU (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive



  •