archive-org.com » ORG » D » DIRECTIONSERVICE.ORG

Total: 876

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • RAISE Article Details
    Members Español Additional Resources For Mediators IDEA Legal Locate Professionals Locate Trainers Preparing for Dispute Resolution Processes Research Evaluation State Information Systems Design Training Resources Part C Early Intervention CADRE Products State Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase Parent Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase CADRE Webinars Calendar This document does not offer formal policy guidance from the Office of Special Education Programs at the United States Department of Education Subscribe to The CADRE Caucus WHAT S CADRE CAUCUS Share CADRE Tweet This site is funded by Subscribe to CADRE s Practitioner List Serve WHAT S PRACTITIONER LIST SERVE RAISE Article Details Email this Print this ARTICLE INFORMATION Title Parents Experiences as Predictors of State Accountability Measures of Schools Facilitation of Parent Involvement Publication Date April 2015 Authors Elbaum B Blatz E T and Rodriguez R J Source Remedial and Special Education Abstract Abstract The aim of this study was to ascertain which dimensions of parents experiences with schools are most strongly associated with parents perceptions that schools are or are not facilitating parent involvement as mandated by the federal accountability system under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act IDEA Participants were 92 parents of students with disabilities from 18 schools in 8 school

    Original URL path: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/raisedetails.cfm?id=1843 (2016-02-09)
    Open archived version from archive


  • RAISE Article Details
    IDEA Legal Locate Professionals Locate Trainers Preparing for Dispute Resolution Processes Research Evaluation State Information Systems Design Training Resources Part C Early Intervention CADRE Products State Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase Parent Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase CADRE Webinars Calendar This document does not offer formal policy guidance from the Office of Special Education Programs at the United States Department of Education Subscribe to The CADRE Caucus WHAT S CADRE CAUCUS Share CADRE Tweet This site is funded by Subscribe to CADRE s Practitioner List Serve WHAT S PRACTITIONER LIST SERVE RAISE Article Details Email this Print this ARTICLE INFORMATION Title Special Education Law Illustrative Basics and Nuances of Key IDEA Components Publication Date March 2015 Authors Zirkel P A Source Teacher Education and Special Education Abstract Abstract Intended as professional development for both new and experienced special educators this article provides both the basic requirements and nuanced issues for foundational successive and overlapping key components under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act IDEA a child find b eligibility and c free appropriate public education FAPE The introductory section identifies ensuing IDEA components along with relatively recent references for each of them Next the section for each component includes the pertinent IDEA

    Original URL path: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/raisedetails.cfm?id=1844 (2016-02-09)
    Open archived version from archive

  • RAISE Article Details
    CADRE Continuum Literature Database For Family Members Español Additional Resources For Mediators IDEA Legal Locate Professionals Locate Trainers Preparing for Dispute Resolution Processes Research Evaluation State Information Systems Design Training Resources Part C Early Intervention CADRE Products State Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase Parent Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase CADRE Webinars Calendar This document does not offer formal policy guidance from the Office of Special Education Programs at the United States Department of Education Subscribe to The CADRE Caucus WHAT S CADRE CAUCUS Share CADRE Tweet This site is funded by Subscribe to CADRE s Practitioner List Serve WHAT S PRACTITIONER LIST SERVE RAISE Article Details Email this Print this ARTICLE INFORMATION Title Quality in Individualized Family Service Plans Guidelines for Practitioners Programs and Families Publication Date January 2015 Authors Gatmaitan M and Brown T Source Young Exceptional Children Abstract This article provides guidance and recommendations for practitioners and families around five components of an IFSP functional assessment functional outcome writing linking functional outcomes to services service integration progress monitoring Each component should be an opportunity to build and solidify the relationship to better support young children and families toward empowerment Excerpt In this article we will describe concerns or challenges around

    Original URL path: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/raisedetails.cfm?id=1845 (2016-02-09)
    Open archived version from archive

  • RAISE Article Details
    CADRE Continuum Literature Database For Family Members Español Additional Resources For Mediators IDEA Legal Locate Professionals Locate Trainers Preparing for Dispute Resolution Processes Research Evaluation State Information Systems Design Training Resources Part C Early Intervention CADRE Products State Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase Parent Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase CADRE Webinars Calendar This document does not offer formal policy guidance from the Office of Special Education Programs at the United States Department of Education Subscribe to The CADRE Caucus WHAT S CADRE CAUCUS Share CADRE Tweet This site is funded by Subscribe to CADRE s Practitioner List Serve WHAT S PRACTITIONER LIST SERVE RAISE Article Details Email this Print this ARTICLE INFORMATION Title Looking Backward and Framing the Future for Parents Aspirations for Their Children With Disabilities Publication Date Jan Feb 2015 Authors Turnbull R and Turnbull A Source Remediate and Special Education Volume 36 Issue 1 Pages 52 57 Abstract Abstract This article frames the past and future role of the parents of children with disabilities within the context of special education We highlight their past aspirations to organize nationally to assert that their children could learn to codify into law their children s right to an education and to foster

    Original URL path: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/raisedetails.cfm?id=1846 (2016-02-09)
    Open archived version from archive

  • RAISE Article Details
    for Dispute Resolution Processes Research Evaluation State Information Systems Design Training Resources Part C Early Intervention CADRE Products State Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase Parent Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase CADRE Webinars Calendar This document does not offer formal policy guidance from the Office of Special Education Programs at the United States Department of Education Subscribe to The CADRE Caucus WHAT S CADRE CAUCUS Share CADRE Tweet This site is funded by Subscribe to CADRE s Practitioner List Serve WHAT S PRACTITIONER LIST SERVE RAISE Article Details Email this Print this ARTICLE INFORMATION Title A Longitudinal Study of Special Education Due Process Hearings in Massachusetts Issues Representation and Student Characteristics Publication Date January March 2015 Authors Blackwell W H and Blackwell V V Source SAGE Open Volume 5 Issue 1 Abstract Abstract Of the three formal dispute resolution procedures provided by the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004 IDEA due process hearings are the most costly in terms of time fiscal resources and impact on relationships between school personnel and parents This study examined 258 due process hearings held over the past 8 years in Massachusetts to examine the characteristics of students at the center of these disputes the issues that

    Original URL path: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/raisedetails.cfm?id=1842 (2016-02-09)
    Open archived version from archive

  • RAISE Article Details
    State Forms System Design Training Resources Video Resources The National Center on Dispute Resolution in Special Education Encouraging the use of mediation and other collaborative strategies to resolve disagreements about special education and early intervention programs CADRE Resources Home CADRE Continuum Literature Database For Family Members Español Additional Resources For Mediators IDEA Legal Locate Professionals Locate Trainers Preparing for Dispute Resolution Processes Research Evaluation State Information Systems Design Training Resources Part C Early Intervention CADRE Products State Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase Parent Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase CADRE Webinars Calendar This document does not offer formal policy guidance from the Office of Special Education Programs at the United States Department of Education Subscribe to The CADRE Caucus WHAT S CADRE CAUCUS Share CADRE Tweet This site is funded by Subscribe to CADRE s Practitioner List Serve WHAT S PRACTITIONER LIST SERVE RAISE Article Details Email this Print this ARTICLE INFORMATION Title Framing the Future SelfDetermination Publication Date Jan Feb 2015 Authors Wehmeyer M L Source Remediate and Special Education Volume 36 Issue 1 Pages 20 23 Abstract This article offers reflections and recommendations on self determination of students with disabilities Abstract There is an established and still growing evidence base that

    Original URL path: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/raisedetails.cfm?id=1847 (2016-02-09)
    Open archived version from archive

  • RAISE Article Details
    List Serve WHAT S PRACTITIONER LIST SERVE RAISE Article Details Email this Print this ARTICLE INFORMATION Title The Facilitated Individualized Education Program Process State Perspectives Publication Date December 2014 Authors Wagner J Source Clemson University doctoral dissertation Abstract Abstract Conflict between parents and school personnel continues to be an area of concern for students with disabilities despite efforts by lawmakers to provide more parental input into the process of identification and continuation of special education services Recent data suggest that unresolved conflict at the local level can cost a school district thousands of dollars to resolve the conflict in court without consideration to the emotional costs that can be involved with this type of conflict resolution Through mandates from IDEA 2004 alternative dispute resolution ADR strategies such as facilitated individualized education program FIEP meetings have been utilized to reduce these costs FIEP meetings offer an alternative to costly litigation by utilizing a neutral third party to ensure all stakeholders involved in the FIEP meeting are focused on the best interests of the child ADR strategies specifically FIEP meetings have not been widely researched More than half the states utilize these meetings therefore it is important to research what if any impact these meetings have on resolving conflict between stakeholders This study examined the different types of ADR utilized across the states specifically FIEP meetings and data were collected regarding their effectiveness Results revealed that the overarching perception regarding their effectiveness are positive however there are some limitations to these meetings and not all states collect and or report data regarding FIEP meetings Additionally there are many different parameters regarding the implementation and use of FIEP meetings including the training offered compensation and case load for facilitators and years these meetings have been offered state wide Implications and suggestions for future

    Original URL path: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/raisedetails.cfm?id=1857 (2016-02-09)
    Open archived version from archive

  • RAISE Article Details
    Showcase Parent Dispute Resolution Resource Showcase CADRE Webinars Calendar This document does not offer formal policy guidance from the Office of Special Education Programs at the United States Department of Education Subscribe to The CADRE Caucus WHAT S CADRE CAUCUS Share CADRE Tweet This site is funded by Subscribe to CADRE s Practitioner List Serve WHAT S PRACTITIONER LIST SERVE RAISE Article Details Email this Print this ARTICLE INFORMATION Title National Trends in the Frequency and Outcomes of Hearing and Review Officer Decisions Under the IDEA An Empirical Analysis Publication Date Fall 2014 Authors Zirkel P A Skidmore C A Source Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 29 Issue 3 Pages 525 575 Abstract This article presents trends in hearing review officer decisions under IDEA Employing a sample of 361 cases from around the country drawn randomly from thirty five years of cases published in the Individuals with Disabilities Law Report this research documents that a handful of jurisdictions account for the vast majority of decisions The article reports an inverse U trend in the frequency of cases a steady upward phase from the initial interval in 1978 82 until a leveling off in 2003 2007 and then a

    Original URL path: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/raisedetails.cfm?id=1816 (2016-02-09)
    Open archived version from archive



  •