archive-org.com » ORG » I » IAPR-TC11.ORG

Total: 1082

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • Modification date 24 March 2010 08:18:24 - TC11
    Projects 17 April 2010 17 15 33 Logo 17 April 2010 17 15 13 Iapr tc11 png 16 April 2010 03 07 22 DAS Dataset Submission Form v05 doc 25 March 2010 15 31 30 Tc 11 Logo v2 small whiteback3 png 25 March 2010 13 58 36 Tc 11 Logo v2 small whiteback2 png 25 March 2010 13 57 05 Tc 11 Logo v2 small whiteback png 25 March 2010 13 54 30 Web Text v01 doc 25 March 2010 08 53 52 Tc 11 Logo v2 72dpi png 24 March 2010 08 18 24 Newsletter 2010 03 22 txt 24 March 2010 07 14 27 Newsletter 2010 02 22 txt 24 March 2010 07 14 19 Newsletter 2010 01 19 txt 24 March 2010 07 14 09 Newsletter 2009 12 19 txt 24 March 2010 07 13 59 Newsletter 2009 11 21 txt 24 March 2010 07 13 49 Newsletter 2009 10 14 txt 24 March 2010 07 13 38 Newsletter 2009 09 17 txt 24 March 2010 07 13 30 Newsletter 2009 08 20 txt 24 March 2010 07 13 14 Newsletter 2009 07 22 txt 24 March 2010 07 13 05 Newsletter 2009 06 29 txt

    Original URL path: http://www.iapr-tc11.org/mediawiki/index.php/Special:SearchByProperty/Modification-20date/24-20March-202010-2008:18:24 (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • File:Tc-11 Logo v2 72dpi.png
    08 18 24 show properties that link here Enter the name of the page to start browsing from Retrieved from http www iapr tc11 org mediawiki index php Special Browse Personal tools 91 105 69 17 Talk for this IP

    Original URL path: http://www.iapr-tc11.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Special:Browse&offset=0&dir=out&article=File%3ATc-11+Logo+v2+72dpi.png (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Newsletter Archive - Discussion on quality control & IAPR - TC11
    contact with are The same with journals I use that when I evaluate the people I meet at these conferences and for journals when we interview job candidates Your idea of having a rating is good but I don t know if it can be implemented or if it were to be implemented whether it would have any validity I m sure that you are aware that some papers presented in lower ranking conferences and workshops are better than some at high end workshops I went to ICPR for the first time 2 years ago While there were many good papers I felt on a whole very disappointed given the reputation of the conference You have your table of rankings on the TC 11 opinion corner webpage and you list ICDAR as lower than ICPR but on a whole I found the ICDAR papers last year better on average than the papers I saw at ICPR 2 years ago I think I can say the same with the papers at ICDAR 01 also Also a bigger threat to quality is repetition of papers 2 years ago I saw one paper at ICPR and saw almost I mean very almost same slides 100 match in meaningful content certainly no new results the written documents aren t verbatim but match more than 80 the identical paper at workshop So combining these two effects my ranking of ICPR went way down from what I had been lead to believe from hearsay and my ranking of that author really plummeted Actually the observation that paper versions were submitted with a very limited edit distance is one of the triggers of the ongoing discussion LS Also if you are going to look at ranking I m not sure how ranking within one sponsor organization will help overall when the real problem is so many conferences across a range of sponsoring organizations Good luck on this project If quality isn t discussed it will only be attained by chance Commentator B India I wish to add my two bits worth for the FFT Recently in our field conferences like ICDAR want registration fee to be paid so that papers get included into the conference proceedings I think this will reduce the academic worth of the proceedings My apprehension is that proceedings contents will be dominated by the papers of richer authors Papers from financially poorer authors shall fail to find expression Therefore I would give a higher star rating to a conference which would publish the best papers Commentator C Europe edited LS Conference Proceedings that are published by Springer LNCS already have higher status than a limited edition proceedings without ISBN which is printed locally by the organizers This is a status enhancement solution by many workshops yes but the actual quality control has to be determined by the criteria for quality which exist in our actual community the IAPR LS I consider favorite workshop a stable satellite I will tell my dean and director

    Original URL path: http://www.iapr-tc11.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Newsletter_Archive_-_Discussion_on_quality_control_%26_IAPR&oldid=1015 (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • View source for Newsletter Archive - Discussion on quality control & IAPR - TC11
    everything including conferences I know I have my own internal ranking of how good the conferences I attend and have contact with are The same with journals I use that when I evaluate the people I meet at these conferences and for journals when we interview job candidates Your idea of having a rating is good but I don t know if it can be implemented or if it were to be implemented whether it would have any validity I m sure that you are aware that some papers presented in lower ranking conferences and workshops are better than some at high end workshops I went to ICPR for the first time 2 years ago While there were many good papers I felt on a whole very disappointed given the reputation of the conference You have your table of rankings on the TC 11 opinion corner webpage and you list ICDAR as lower than ICPR but on a whole I found the ICDAR papers last year better on average than the papers I saw at ICPR 2 years ago I think I can say the same with the papers at ICDAR 01 also Also a bigger threat to quality is repetition of papers 2 years ago I saw one paper at ICPR and saw almost I mean very almost same slides 100 match in meaningful content certainly no new results the written documents aren t verbatim but match more than 80 the identical paper at workshop So combining these two effects my ranking of ICPR went way down from what I had been lead to believe from hearsay and my ranking of that author really plummeted Actually the observation that paper versions were submitted with a very limited edit distance is one of the triggers of the ongoing discussion LS Also if you are going to look at ranking I m not sure how ranking within one sponsor organization will help overall when the real problem is so many conferences across a range of sponsoring organizations Good luck on this project If quality isn t discussed it will only be attained by chance Commentator B India I wish to add my two bits worth for the FFT Recently in our field conferences like ICDAR want registration fee to be paid so that papers get included into the conference proceedings I think this will reduce the academic worth of the proceedings My apprehension is that proceedings contents will be dominated by the papers of richer authors Papers from financially poorer authors shall fail to find expression Therefore I would give a higher star rating to a conference which would publish the best papers Commentator C Europe edited LS Conference Proceedings that are published by Springer LNCS already have higher status than a limited edition proceedings without ISBN which is printed locally by the organizers This is a status enhancement solution by many workshops yes but the actual quality control has to be determined by the criteria for quality which exist in

    Original URL path: http://www.iapr-tc11.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Newsletter_Archive_-_Discussion_on_quality_control_%26_IAPR&action=edit (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Revision history of "Newsletter Archive - Discussion on quality control & IAPR" - TC11
    178 cur prev 22 50 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs m 0 IAPR TC11 Newsletter Archive Discussion on quality control IAPR moved to Newsletter Archive Discussion on quality control IAPR cur prev 22 02 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs m 0 Discussion on quality control IAPR moved to IAPR TC11 Newsletter Archive Discussion on quality control IAPR cur prev 22 01 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 10 cur prev 22 00 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 3 cur prev 22 00 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 2 cur prev 21 59 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 0 cur prev 21 59 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 20 FFT on conference quality control in the near future cur prev 21 58 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 5 FFT on conference quality control in the near future cur prev 21 57 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 4 Comments cur prev 21 56 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 5 cur prev 21 56 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 4 cur prev 21 55 28 August 2009 Masa Talk contribs 12 034 New page TC 11 Opinion Corner FFT on conference quality control

    Original URL path: http://www.iapr-tc11.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Newsletter_Archive_-_Discussion_on_quality_control_%26_IAPR&action=history (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Pages that link to "Newsletter Archive - Discussion on quality control & IAPR" - TC11
    Category talk DAS Discussion Filters Hide transclusions Hide links Hide redirects The following pages link to Newsletter Archive Discussion on quality control IAPR View previous 50 next 50 20 50 100 250 500 Newsletter Archive links TC11 Newsletter Archive Discussion on quality control IAPR redirect page links View previous 50 next 50 20 50 100 250 500 Retrieved from http www iapr tc11 org mediawiki index php Special WhatLinksHere Newsletter

    Original URL path: http://www.iapr-tc11.org/mediawiki/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere/Newsletter_Archive_-_Discussion_on_quality_control_%26_IAPR (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Changes related to "Newsletter Archive - Discussion on quality control & IAPR" - TC11
    days Hide minor edits Show bots Hide anonymous users Hide logged in users Hide my edits Show new changes starting from 17 43 15 February 2016 Namespace all Main Talk User User talk TC11 TC11 talk File File talk MediaWiki MediaWiki talk Template Template talk Help Help talk Category Category talk DAS Discussion Invert selection Associated namespace Page name Show changes to pages linked to the given page instead No

    Original URL path: http://www.iapr-tc11.org/mediawiki/index.php/Special:RecentChangesLinked/Newsletter_Archive_-_Discussion_on_quality_control_%26_IAPR (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Newsletter Archive - Discussion on quality control & IAPR - TC11
    when I evaluate the people I meet at these conferences and for journals when we interview job candidates Your idea of having a rating is good but I don t know if it can be implemented or if it were to be implemented whether it would have any validity I m sure that you are aware that some papers presented in lower ranking conferences and workshops are better than some at high end workshops I went to ICPR for the first time 2 years ago While there were many good papers I felt on a whole very disappointed given the reputation of the conference You have your table of rankings on the TC 11 opinion corner webpage and you list ICDAR as lower than ICPR but on a whole I found the ICDAR papers last year better on average than the papers I saw at ICPR 2 years ago I think I can say the same with the papers at ICDAR 01 also Also a bigger threat to quality is repetition of papers 2 years ago I saw one paper at ICPR and saw almost I mean very almost same slides 100 match in meaningful content certainly no new results the written documents aren t verbatim but match more than 80 the identical paper at workshop So combining these two effects my ranking of ICPR went way down from what I had been lead to believe from hearsay and my ranking of that author really plummeted Actually the observation that paper versions were submitted with a very limited edit distance is one of the triggers of the ongoing discussion LS Also if you are going to look at ranking I m not sure how ranking within one sponsor organization will help overall when the real problem is so many conferences across a range of sponsoring organizations Good luck on this project If quality isn t discussed it will only be attained by chance Commentator B India I wish to add my two bits worth for the FFT Recently in our field conferences like ICDAR want registration fee to be paid so that papers get included into the conference proceedings I think this will reduce the academic worth of the proceedings My apprehension is that proceedings contents will be dominated by the papers of richer authors Papers from financially poorer authors shall fail to find expression Therefore I would give a higher star rating to a conference which would publish the best papers Commentator C Europe edited LS Conference Proceedings that are published by Springer LNCS already have higher status than a limited edition proceedings without ISBN which is printed locally by the organizers This is a status enhancement solution by many workshops yes but the actual quality control has to be determined by the criteria for quality which exist in our actual community the IAPR LS I consider favorite workshop a stable satellite I will tell my dean and director that in order to remain visible in this field I

    Original URL path: http://www.iapr-tc11.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Newsletter_Archive_-_Discussion_on_quality_control_%26_IAPR&printable=yes (2016-02-15)
    Open archived version from archive



  •